Close

Child's Access to Firearms

It is well documented that Maryland has some of most restrictive gun laws in the country. Not only has it become de facto impossible for an everyday law abiding citizen to obtain a concealed carry permit, but the state has also taken drastic measures to outlaw numerous popular types of firearms. The environment surrounding firearms in our state has become so unwelcoming that Beretta, a major gun manufacturer, recently moved their Southern Maryland factory and hundreds of jobs to Tennessee. This move was in direct response to state legislators banning a so-called high capacity magazine that is essential to one of Beretta’s most popular handgun models. High capacity magazines are now defined as containing 10 or rounds, an arbitrary number that has caused much discontent among gun owners and dealers.

These restrictive state laws have not only harmed businesses, cost the state jobs, and angered gun owners. They have also increased the amount of attention that the criminal justice system places on the prosecution of firearms crimes. Prosecutors and even judges in many jurisdictions have become caught up in the state’s developing anti gun attitude, and defendants now face increased prosecutions and harsher sentences upon convictions. State’s Attorney’s Offices are choosing to file charges for weapons cases that many people do not even realize are criminal offenses. One of these offenses is located in criminal law section 4-104, entitled child’s access to firearms. This law prohibits a person from storing or leaving a loaded firearm in a location where the person knew or should have known that an unsupervised child would gain access to it. A violation of this statute is a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of up to $1,000, meaning that this law itself does not carry the possibility of jail time. But often the charge of reckless endangerment accompanies a child access to firearms case, and reckless endangerment does carry jail time.

The wording of the child’s access to firearms statute is extremely vague and general, which means that police and prosecutors have an unfairly wide margin of error when deciding to pursue theses cases. On the other hand it also gives a skilled and experienced defense attorney the opportunity to destroy the prosecutions case. The law requires the state to prove that the defendant knew or should have known a child could access the firearm. There are no specific requirements under state law about how to store a gun, and there is no checklist for gun owners to follow. In the absence of strict guidelines there is simply no way that the state should be able to hold a person responsible for the actions of a child that has taken something without permission. If you or a loved one is charged with child’s access to firearm the stakes are simply to high not to fight back. A conviction could result in a permanent criminal record and even jail time if reckless endangerment charges are filed. In addition, a person charged with this offense faces enormous civil liability regardless of the fact that a conviction for this offense is inadmissible in civil court. Fight back, and contact an experienced firearms lawyer today at 410-207-2598.

Client Reviews
★★★★★
"I am writing this letter to thank you for doing such a great job in my case. If it were not for what you did I would still be in jail right now. My family and I are very grateful I have a second chance at life now, and if it wouldn't be like this if you were not so good at what you do. Thank you again Benjamin!" T.S.
★★★★★
"I want to commend you on the excellent representation that you provided on my son's case case. I truly appreciate everything you have done. You are a dedicated, very professional, and caring individual. We both wish you the utmost success in your legal career and future endeavors." Raquel and Joseph M.
★★★★★
"Thank you for all the time and effort that you put into defending my case. You were willing to fight for me when nobody else would believe my story, and you did not back down from the prosecutor. Another lawyer would have urged me to plead guilty, but you were willing to fight for me, and in the end justice was served. I appreciate everything you did and wish you all the best." Fred D.
Contact Us