Constructive Possession of Drugs

Constructive Possession of DrugsIn almost every drug possession case, the first question that any criminal defense lawyer will ask is where the drugs were found.  The specific location where the police retrieved the drug evidence will often dictate what types of pre trial motions that a lawyer can file.  The location of the drugs may also have significant impact on whether your case is a strong case for trial in front of a judge or a jury.  Location is everything in real estate, and it is almost everything in a Maryland drug possession case as well.  Regardless of whether you have been charged with possession of marijuana, possession of cocaine, or even possession of a prescription drug, where the cops say they found the drug evidence could make all the difference.

The most basic type of possession is actual possession.  Actual possession is discussed on another page in the drug crimes section, and it basically means that the drugs were found on the person.  But many drug possession cases are not as simple as a police officer finding a bag of pot, or a couple of pills in a defendants pocket or in their hand.  When a person is charged with drug possession but does not actual have physical possession of the drugs then that person is charged with constructive possession.  Constructive possession is not unique to Maryland law, as nearly every state has statutes and considerable case law on constructive possession.  Constructive possession in Maryland exists when an article, usually drugs or a weapon, is taken into a person’s control or held at that person’s disposal but it is not on his or her person.  The duration of the possession and the amount possessed are not relevant to prove constructive possession, and it is not necessary for the prosecuting lawyer to prove actual ownership of the evidence at issue.  This sounds like a large amount of legal jargon, and it is, but it is important to understand this legal jargon because it will appear in all constructive possession trials.

The constructive possession laws basically require that the arresting officer, and then the judge or jury take all the circumstances into account before determining whether there is possession.  Many constructive possession drug cases involve more than one possible defendant.  In joint possession narcotics cases the distance between the defendant and the alleged drugs is one of the most important factors in determining whether there is constructive possession.  Other factors include whether the drugs were within the view of the defendant, whether the drugs were hidden, and whether the defendant had ownership or a possessory right to the place where the drugs were found.  If drugs were found in a person’s home or apartment it may be inferred that he or she knew about their presence and had control over them.

In a trial for constructive possession of drugs the judge or jury will consider all these circumstances.  A drug possession lawyer has numerous arguments to combat a constructive possession case such as lack of knowledge of the drug’s presence by the defendant and lack of control over the place where the drugs were found.  The criminal defense lawyers at The Herbst Firm have successfully argued dozens of constructive possession motions and have prevailed in constructive drug possession trials.  If you or someone you know has been charged with drug possession in Maryland, contact The Herbst Firm for a free consultation about the defenses that may be available in your case.
Client Reviews
"I am writing this letter to thank you for doing such a great job in my case. If it were not for what you did I would still be in jail right now. My family and I are very grateful I have a second chance at life now, and if it wouldn't be like this if you were not so good at what you do. Thank you again Benjamin!" T.S.
"I want to commend you on the excellent representation that you provided on my son's case case. I truly appreciate everything you have done. You are a dedicated, very professional, and caring individual. We both wish you the utmost success in your legal career and future endeavors." Raquel and Joseph M.
"Thank you for all the time and effort that you put into defending my case. You were willing to fight for me when nobody else would believe my story, and you did not back down from the prosecutor. Another lawyer would have urged me to plead guilty, but you were willing to fight for me, and in the end justice was served. I appreciate everything you did and wish you all the best." Fred D.
Contact Us for a Free Consultation
Office Phone Number